Monday, September 29, 2008

Wrap up & next week.

Hello Team Awesome, good work on the PSA yesterday.

In the next few weeks we are taking our studies of participation into the world of the internet (particularly web 2.0 and "social networking") and fine art. We'll see where those lines blur, and consider the differences and similarities of these acts of participation to the ones we have considered in the community media context.

Next week, we have a guest artist (Andrew Lynn) coming to discuss his participatory art practice. Additionally, I will provide a brief history of the internet, from its conception through today (it's a longer timeline than you might think!). Finally, Andrew and I will demonstrate some useful web 2.0 tools, in preparation for your next assignment.

NEXT WEEK'S QUESTION:
How does Youtube (or other online social networking/collaborative platforms) compare to public access TV or other community media projects we've looked at? Use the example of Youtube and at least two other examples from the links below to anchor your response to this question. Bonus question: Who benefits and who is in control?
IMPORTANT NOTES: The Umberto Eco ("The Poetics of the Open Work") listed on your syllabus will now assigned for next week. The Marysia Lewandowska piece is now optional.

Reading (required): Chapters 1+5 from Everything is Miscellaneous (David Weinberger)
... and in contrast to Weinberger's enthusiasm about web 2.0:
Reading (optional):"From Enthusiasm to Creative Commons” (Marysia Lewandowska);
...and the Enthusiasts archive (check out some of the films!)

Artwork/projects to review: (note: just glancing at a webpage does not constitute viewing these works -- many of them demand a little time and consideration, and/or even seeking more information in order to understand and engage!)

Video sharing & related:
Conceptual art/projects based on "tagging":
Crowd-produced artworks:
Optional related things (maybe start to give you ideas for your NEXT PROJECT!):

No comments: